Return-Path: 
 <general-return-16430-apmail-gump-general-archive=gump.apache.org@gump.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-gump-general-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-gump-general-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DD5619D2C
	for <apmail-gump-general-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Thu, 27 Dec 2012 06:18:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 38870 invoked by uid 500); 27 Dec 2012 06:18:56 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-gump-general-archive@gump.apache.org
Received: (qmail 38675 invoked by uid 500); 27 Dec 2012 06:18:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact general-help@gump.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:general-unsubscribe@gump.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:general-help@gump.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:general@gump.apache.org>
List-Id: "Gump code and data" <general.gump.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Gump code and data" <general@gump.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list general@gump.apache.org
Received: (qmail 38622 invoked by uid 99); 27 Dec 2012 06:18:48 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 06:18:48 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [66.111.4.28] (HELO out4-smtp.messagingengine.com)
 (66.111.4.28)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 06:18:41 +0000
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.43])
	by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A67C20979
	for <general@gump.apache.org>; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 01:18:21 -0500 (EST)
Received: from frontend1.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.160])
  by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 27 Dec 2012 01:18:21 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
	messagingengine.com; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=smtpout;
	 bh=9VZpyiGguCdTkaAgGffYjuXzgDw=; b=gfJwirNIH6TF6FSxW+8nYI59NtFD
	UXIzWWHjUcNz2K/pQuQ9ScozX5QJzv4PySdWr/fxi0Tmq9qb/FDw3vYiMA5paR+T
	vkb8Lr2JuzkTfmPbDRjFApmPbkGBfnosLCjVMByMowrjVwt+oSVMO76/fHStm22y
	gjI4UW5FF5mYdqk=
X-Sasl-enc: E4Fae2qTUrHtNB2LJEw5xJzYOr4hFzkpEQzIjHylah3P 1356589100
Received: from localhost (unknown [123.51.18.38])
	by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2D54E8E06F8
	for <general@gump.apache.org>; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 01:18:19 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 17:18:17 +1100
From: David Crossley <crossley@apache.org>
To: Gump code and data <general@gump.apache.org>
Subject: Re: help with "forrest-test" gump run
Message-ID: <20121227061817.GB1303@igg.local>
References: <20121221124559.GB39682@igg.local> <87txraobtl.fsf@v35516.1blu.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87txraobtl.fsf@v35516.1blu.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
> >
> > Help please with working out why the "forrest-test" run of Gump is broken.
> > http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/forrest/forrest-test/
> 
> Sorry, have been (and likely will continue to be for the next few days)
> mostly offline.

Thanks, me too.

> You have modified the build process enough that there
> is no fetch-local-unversioned-plugin target to see in the log anymore.

Yep, i am trying a completely different approach now.
Deploying the plugins, then forcing the test to use them
rather than forrest's fancy plugin finding mechanism.

> Right now I see configure-plugin failing for PDF - is the where you'd
> suppose the plugin to be downloaded?

It is different now :-) This is fine, as i am gradually working
to fix various things that Gump encounters. I reckon that it
is on the home straight.

> Looking through FOR-1235 and your XSL, you have
> 
> <target name="fetch-local-unversioned-plugin" unless="plugin-found">
> 
> which means the target would be skipped if the property plugin-found was
> set for any reason.
>
>  The Gump output you quote inside the JIRA ticket
> really looks like the one you'd get if a target was skipped because of
> an if/unless attribute.

Drat, i should have updated the issue with a snippet from
a more recent Gump run. I think that it got past that stage
but completely missed the next "get-local".

After this new approach is settled, i hope to make some time.

Of course the challenge is to work out why the difference
between a local build and the Gump one.

> You certainly could be triggering a bug/feature in Ant or Ant-Contrib
> present only in trunk but not the version you use locally, but neither
> project has been really active lately so that's not too likely.
> 
> Maybe you could build Ant from trunk and see whether your local build
> still fails with that as well.

Good idea. It has been a while since Forrest upgraded various
dependencies, so a job that needs doing anyway.

Thanks again for your efforts Stefan.

-David

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@gump.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@gump.apache.org