Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-gump-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 89558 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2007 12:14:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Feb 2007 12:14:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 84079 invoked by uid 500); 28 Feb 2007 12:14:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-gump-general-archive@gump.apache.org Received: (qmail 84037 invoked by uid 500); 28 Feb 2007 12:14:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@gump.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Gump code and data" Reply-To: "Gump code and data" Delivered-To: mailing list general@gump.apache.org Received: (qmail 84025 invoked by uid 99); 28 Feb 2007 12:14:18 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 04:14:18 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 04:14:06 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51F7E6B9CD; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:13:44 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 0tgRJu8rEhh8; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:13:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ha-node-br2.hpl.hp.com (ha-node-br2.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.57]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2919D6B9CC; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:13:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [16.25.171.182] (chamonix.hpl.hp.com [16.25.171.182]) by ha-node-br2.hpl.hp.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l1SCDVaX007829; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:13:31 GMT Message-ID: <45E571EB.8040502@apache.org> Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:13:31 +0000 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gump code and data CC: axis-dev Subject: Re: packaged projects required for 2 dependencies of commons-jelly-tags-soap References: <862E4EF6-932B-4423-9ED6-7257C6443C82@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <862E4EF6-932B-4423-9ED6-7257C6443C82@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > Hello Stefan, > > it looks like the intention of the developers of commons-jelly-tags-soap > was to use two distinct saaj jars and two distinct jaxrpc jars, > one from axis, and one from geronimo. > > The project.xml [1] of commons-jelly-tags-soap suggest that the gump > build could use the jars from axis twice, once for what they are and > once to replace the jars of geronimo. > > I wonder whether it would not be better to download geronimo and to use > the real jars of geronimo. > > I will give a shot at using twice the same jars, not sure whether it > will work to get a build, and even less sure that this will mean > anything. [2] > Looking at the dependencies of jelly, http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/soap/project.xml It looks like it needs any one of -Sun JAX-RPC 1.3 (v2.0 is built in to Java 6), and is also built in to the javaee 5 artifact that is in the java.net m1 repository. -Axis 1.2 (should be a later one of that) -geronimo 1.1 You have to uncomment the one you want; project.xml, ivy.xml and poms are yet to come to terms with the whole notion of aggregate/bundled XML specs floating around things -they also depend on jaxme for javax.xml.namespace.QName, which is built in to Java5 and so not needed on Gump. 1. we can drop the jaxme dependency as gump is java1.5+ 2. if jelly needs a jaxrpc, it should take the Axis1.x branch version, unless anyone on axis-dev says otherwise. remember, these are just the interface files, not the implementation. A build against JAX-RPC 1.3 is all that they want, and they are not going to get it if they try and build on java6, no matter how hard they try. -steve --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@gump.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@gump.apache.org