gump-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Curt Arnold <>
Subject Re: log4net on Gump
Date Wed, 21 Feb 2007 19:58:01 GMT

On Feb 20, 2007, at 10:50 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:

> On Tue, 20 Feb 2007, Curt Arnold <> wrote:
>> The nant project fails and I'm guessing that Gump is executable a
>> fallback behavior to run an previously installed version of NAnt.
> No, Gump doesn't do anything like that.  Unfortunately.
> Gump picks up NAnt.exe from PATH, that's it.  Even though I've written
> (well, pasted together would be closer to the truth) the NAnt specific
> code in Gump, I can't remember whether it has ever really been used at
> all.  It may very well be possible that it doesn't work as advertized.
>> However, Mono just installs a /usr/bin/nant symbolic link which
>> would not be invoked if NAnt.exe was invoked.
> Why should it?  Running "mono NAnt.exe" should work just fine.
> Stefan

Gump's <nant> builder doesn't seem to exec "mono NAnt.exe", it just  
execs "NAnt.exe" which isn't an executable or on the path on a Mono  
install (at least on Mac OS/X).  If the builder were changed to just  
exec "nant" or a symlink were added that redirected NAnt.exe to /usr/ 
bin/nant then it would likely get a little further.  On Mac OS/X, / 
usr/bin/nant is just a little more complicated than "mono  
NAnt.exe" (it sets an environment variable too).

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message