gump-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Steve Loughran <>
Subject Re: Gump PMC Report 09/2006
Date Mon, 18 Sep 2006 12:17:18 GMT
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Infrastructure:
> * During the past weeks we've repeatedly run into disk usage problems,
>   we are slowly but steadily outgrowing the resources provided by
>   vmgump.  We'll shortly engage in a discussion with the
>   infrastructure team to see, what our options are.
> * We've informed osuosl and the infrastructure team that we'd like to
>   give back
> Technical:
> * Maven2 support hasn't improved during the past quarter.
>   To tell the truth, we don't have any people actively developing
>   anything right now, so we don't expect this to change unless anybody
>   jumps in.
>   Gump is more and more moving into the direction of a pure
>   infrastructure/service type of project with a handful of people
>   maintaining it.  This isn't necessarily a bad thing since Gump's
>   code is pretty stable and - except for Maven 2 support - does what
>   it is supposed to do.
> * All CVS locations for sourceforge projects have been fixed by now.

I may have got some interest from some of the jboss people in joining 
gump. Having hibernate on would be very beneficial.

> Other:
> * still all Apache committers have access to metadata in svn.
> * no releases.

in the SAAS world, its not clear that you need to release it. Especially 
if you have VMWare images ready for reuse.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message