Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-gump-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 3022 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2006 19:42:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Mar 2006 19:42:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 40144 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2006 19:42:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-gump-general-archive@gump.apache.org Received: (qmail 40096 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2006 19:42:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@gump.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Gump code and data" Reply-To: "Gump code and data" Delivered-To: mailing list general@gump.apache.org Received: (qmail 40084 invoked by uid 99); 23 Mar 2006 19:42:04 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 11:42:04 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [217.160.128.107] (HELO www.samaflost.de) (217.160.128.107) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 11:42:04 -0800 Received: by www.samaflost.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 485CC88A422; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 20:41:43 +0100 (CET) To: general@gump.apache.org Subject: Re: [Ant-contrib-developers] [GUMP@vmgump]: Project ant-contrib-test (in module ant-contrib) failed X-Draft-From: ("nnfolder:mail.gump-general" 10571) References: <56554CB9-BFE6-4FCD-9215-0147A08B8447@houston.rr.com> From: Stefan Bodewig Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 20:41:43 +0100 In-Reply-To: <56554CB9-BFE6-4FCD-9215-0147A08B8447@houston.rr.com> (Curt Arnold's message of "Sat, 18 Mar 2006 14:27:06 -0600") Message-ID: <8764m5ne2w.fsf@www.samaflost.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Security Through Obscurity, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Sat, 18 Mar 2006, Curt Arnold wrote: > On Mar 18, 2006, at 3:52 AM, Gump Integration Build wrote: > >> To whom it may engage... >> >> > > There have been no changes in the implementation or test in many > many months. The time of first failure appears to be the same as > the time that log4j started failing due to an Ant bug that occurs > when JUnit 4 is in the class path. No, they started to fail when Gump started to use Java5. The tests have never passed on Java5 (even back when we ran the first Java5 Gump builds on helios). Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@gump.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@gump.apache.org