gump-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: jaxme
Date Sat, 03 Sep 2005 22:22:20 GMT
On 9/1/05, robert burrell donkin <rdonkin@apache.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 06:09 +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, robert burrell donkin <rdonkin@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > the original plan was to try to run two gump builds until the
> > > mavenised one was debugged. however, since the original run is no
> > > longer running very well, i suppose that there may be an argument
> > > for biting the bullet and moving now.
> >
> > I wouldn't expect the Maven run to work any better or worse than the
> > Ant one, so go ahead if you feel like it.
> >
> > The main problems we have with mavenized projects in Gump are
> >
> > (1) artifact-Id mismatches
> >
> > (2) projects depending on Maven plugins that are not (yet) installed
> > on the Gump machines.
> >
> > The second point somewhat bothers me since we have a few builds that
> > don't run just because a plugin that we wouldn't use for our builds is not
> > installed.  But that's just me disagreeing with Maven's worldview 8-)
> 
> i agree that this is a little bit bothersome.
> 
> i wonder whether it's not so much a problem with the worldview as a
> lacking feature. i don't know how to specify plugin dependencies for a
> maven build (so they could be automatically downloaded). without this
> feature, the build is not truly automatic or replicable.

Same way you specify any dependencies I thought. Problem is that Gump
builds in --offline mode, so it doesn't download anything.

Hen

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@gump.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@gump.apache.org


Mime
View raw message