gump-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefan Bodewig <>
Subject Re: BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...
Date Mon, 27 Jun 2005 11:59:29 GMT
On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, Leo Simons <> wrote:

> FWIW, the algorithm I have in my head (come to apachecon! We can
> talk about it! :-))

I'll be there - and at the hackathon.  Plenty of time to discuss it.

> would mean that a migrated project would be "*-ed", ie built and
> linked against but considered to have an error, and that the
> corresponding module would be considered failed, and that the
> failure cause for the project would point to the module.

Sounds fine.

> The following e-mails would be sent:
>  - to the module "owner" about the problem (every day)

only works if the module owner is able to change the module defintion
in Gump's metadata.

> Basically, we make "modules" (and repositories and other parts of
> the object model) first-class citizens in the gump world, and
> support notification about them just as well or just as bad as for
> "projects".



To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message