gump-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefano Mazzocchi <>
Subject Re: [PATCH][Gump] your definitions break Gump builds
Date Fri, 17 Jun 2005 03:24:38 GMT
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Stefano Mazzocchi <> wrote:
>>it's not a matter of being annoyed enough (we are already!), it's
>>the fact that cocoon needs that file at build time.
> Hmm, so why don't you realize that you have a typo in it for many
> days?  Like when you rename a jar but forget to update the descriptor?

because cocoon doesn't use *all* of that data, only parts.

Truth be told, cocoon could have two files, one for gump and one for its
own build system, but they would contain the same information.

>>Now, I would be totally in favor of granting the gump committers
>>commit access to the cocoon project.
> Should be quite trivial to add a rule to asf-authorization that grants
> rw to @gump for just that file, at least I think it allows
> file-granularity.

Even better. Can we do it or is it something that infra@ has to do?


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message