Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-gump-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 75935 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2005 13:09:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Apr 2005 13:09:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 42220 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2005 13:10:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-gump-general-archive@gump.apache.org Received: (qmail 42140 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2005 13:10:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@gump.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Gump code and data" Reply-To: "Gump code and data" Delivered-To: mailing list general@gump.apache.org Received: (qmail 41970 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2005 13:10:15 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from bodewig.bost.de (HELO bodewig.bost.de) (62.96.16.111) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 06:10:15 -0700 Received: (from bodewig@localhost) by bodewig.bost.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) id j3QD9TF23414; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 15:09:29 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: bodewig.bost.de: bodewig set sender to bodewig@apache.org using -f To: general@gump.apache.org Subject: Re: [RT] Gump3 design idea: considered harmful X-Draft-From: ("nnfolder:mail.gump-general" 7890) References: From: Stefan Bodewig Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 15:09:29 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Leo Simons's message of "Mon, 25 Apr 2005 20:55:45 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Security Through Obscurity, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Leo Simons wrote: > In the next version of our in development xml model and in the > development of gump3, configuration information is left out and > instead provided on the commandline or using environment > variables. +1 to separating environment configuration from the Module/Project/Repository/Whatever stuff making up a Gump definition. It may too much for env vars, though. I.e. we may end up having too many environment variables or command line options. Looking into my old workspace defintion I'd have basedir, pkgdir and maybe a dir for checked out sources (if I want something other than {basedir}/cvs). Then there is logdir. There may be a dir for jars, javdocs or junitreports, if I want to publish them. Nagging needs a mailserver and a sender address. The database wants to get configured, I guess I could have a location independent of logdir for RSS feeds. The current threads configuration should be part of the environmental setting as well. IMHO we still better maintain these settings in a file. Doesn't have to be an XML file and should be separate from project definitions. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@gump.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@gump.apache.org