Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-gump-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 84758 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2005 14:58:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Apr 2005 14:58:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 58926 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2005 14:58:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-gump-general-archive@gump.apache.org Received: (qmail 58877 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2005 14:58:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@gump.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Gump code and data" Reply-To: "Gump code and data" Delivered-To: mailing list general@gump.apache.org Received: (qmail 58850 invoked by uid 99); 19 Apr 2005 14:58:00 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from bodewig.bost.de (HELO bodewig.bost.de) (62.96.16.111) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 07:57:59 -0700 Received: (from bodewig@localhost) by bodewig.bost.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) id j3JEvq001303; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 16:57:52 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: bodewig.bost.de: bodewig set sender to bodewig@apache.org using -f To: general@gump.apache.org Subject: Re: More jira cleanup!! X-Draft-From: ("nnfolder:mail.gump-general" 7787) References: <42642388.6010700@leosimons.com> From: Stefan Bodewig Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 16:57:52 +0200 In-Reply-To: <42642388.6010700@leosimons.com> (Leo Simons's message of "Mon, 18 Apr 2005 23:15:52 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Security Through Obscurity, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Leo Simons wrote: > What remains is just these 6: > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?pid=10457&fixfor=11120 > > Some of which I don't understand, 8-) For me GUMP-52 is in that category. > some of which could be rescheduled to one of the gump3 versions (but > I wasn't sure about that). GUMP-89 (), GUMP-83 (automatic for ), and GUMP-62 (link ViewCVS for descriptors in reports) are "nice to have"s IMHO and could be rescheduled. The remaining two can probably be closed. > (I hope the links all work, you never really know with jira ;) At least for me they didn't 8-) Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@gump.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@gump.apache.org