gump-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefano Mazzocchi <>
Subject Re: [RT] Gump3 design idea: <workspace/> considered harmful
Date Tue, 26 Apr 2005 19:09:38 GMT
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Leo Simons <> wrote:
>>In the next version of our in development xml model and in the
>>development of gump3, configuration information is left out and
>>instead provided on the commandline or using environment
> +1 to separating environment configuration from the
> Module/Project/Repository/Whatever stuff making up a Gump definition.
> It may too much for env vars, though.  I.e. we may end up having too
> many environment variables or command line options.
> Looking into my old workspace defintion I'd have basedir, pkgdir and
> maybe a dir for checked out sources (if I want something other than
> {basedir}/cvs).  Then there is logdir.
> There may be a dir for jars, javdocs or junitreports, if I want to
> publish them.  Nagging needs a mailserver and a sender address.  The
> database wants to get configured, I guess I could have a location
> independent of logdir for RSS feeds.  The current threads
> configuration should be part of the environmental setting as well.
> IMHO we still better maintain these settings in a file.  Doesn't have
> to be an XML file and should be separate from project definitions.



To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message