Return-Path: 
 <general-return-10258-apmail-gump-general-archive=gump.apache.org@gump.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-gump-general-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 12253 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2005 20:14:17 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Feb 2005 20:14:17 -0000
Received: (qmail 17097 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2005 20:14:16 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-gump-general-archive@gump.apache.org
Received: (qmail 17037 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2005 20:14:15 -0000
Mailing-List: contact general-help@gump.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:general-unsubscribe@gump.apache.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:general-subscribe@gump.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:general-help@gump.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:general@gump.apache.org>
List-Id: "Gump code and data" <general.gump.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Gump code and data" <general@gump.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list general@gump.apache.org
Received: (qmail 17024 invoked by uid 99); 7 Feb 2005 20:14:15 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
	tests=
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from bodewig.bost.de (HELO bodewig.bost.de) (62.96.16.111)
  by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 12:14:13 -0800
Received: (from bodewig@localhost)
	by bodewig.bost.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) id j17KE9l25367;
	Mon, 7 Feb 2005 21:14:09 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: bodewig.bost.de: bodewig set sender to
 bodewig@apache.org using -f
To: general@gump.apache.org
Subject: Re: derby build
X-Draft-From: ("nnfolder:mail.gump-general" 6733)
References: <200501221218.j0MCIaL4029198@Boron.MeepZor.Com>
	<A926DBF8-6DB9-11D9-BA88-003065905854@sbcglobal.net>
	<m3oeff8b58.fsf@bodewig.bost.de>
	<40D150CE-6DFA-11D9-BA88-003065905854@nonintuitive.com>
	<m3zmyzm590.fsf@bodewig.bost.de>
	<EA5EC0E9-6DFD-11D9-BA88-003065905854@sbcglobal.net>
	<m3651lzuxx.fsf@bodewig.bost.de>
	<00CCC589-6F74-11D9-BA88-003065905854@sbcglobal.net>
	<m33bwo4m1q.fsf@bodewig.bost.de>
	<CE109C59-74ED-11D9-A2AA-003065905854@sbcglobal.net>
	<m3u0ov1bum.fsf@bodewig.bost.de>
	<458AAFC6-7678-11D9-A2AA-003065905854@nonintuitive.com>
	<m36518fhig.fsf@bodewig.bost.de>
	<6BA4B4B9-773A-11D9-9873-003065905854@nonintuitive.com>
From: Stefan Bodewig <bodewig@apache.org>
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 21:14:08 +0100
In-Reply-To: <6BA4B4B9-773A-11D9-9873-003065905854@nonintuitive.com> (Samuel
 Andrew McIntyre's message of "Fri, 4 Feb 2005 21:54:38 -0800")
Message-ID: <m38y60w2jz.fsf@bodewig.bost.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Security Through
 Obscurity, linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

On Fri, 4 Feb 2005, Samuel Andrew McIntyre
<fuzzylogic@nonintuitive.com> wrote:

> Actually, in order to prevent Ant from putting the runtime libraries
> on jikes' classpath, we currently set the bootclasspath attribute on
> all <javac> tasks to ${empty}, which is the location of an empty jar
> file.

I see.  Setting includeruntime to false should help, doesn't it?

> So, do we need to define empty=java-runtime-1.3's jarpath for the
> splits that need them (2, 4, and 6)? Or is there more to do than
> that?

That should be enough.  I wasn't sure whether you actually used the
empty property in other places as well, so I suggested yet another
property.

Stefan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@gump.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@gump.apache.org