gump-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefano Mazzocchi <>
Subject Re: [RT] Gump 3.0 - Database Model
Date Mon, 13 Dec 2004 01:09:39 GMT
Eric Pugh wrote:
> Just catching up on my email after being gone for a week.  One thing that
> strikes me about the project id's is that this seems to continue the same
> discussion we have had in the past about maven generated project id's versus
> the gump project id's...
> Do the project id's have to have meaning?  While it's nice to look at a
> project id and pick out some data, like the version and the timestamp or
> what not, eventually gump will run into another project where the id's mean
> something different and are generated differently.  I don't mind a project
> id like "787234" that I then look up and find out is what ever specific
> meaning it has.  Like version, or host, or whatnot.   I think that when we
> establish project naming conventions we'll run into conflicts with how other
> projects name themselves....
>>I would welcome project IDs of the form
>>and then
>>for a particular released version, or

Eric, I really don't care what ID we choose, as long as it does identify 
something univocally also in a global and distributed environment.


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message