Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-gump-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 54914 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2004 10:15:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Nov 2004 10:15:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 72498 invoked by uid 500); 17 Nov 2004 10:15:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-gump-general-archive@gump.apache.org Received: (qmail 72235 invoked by uid 500); 17 Nov 2004 10:15:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@gump.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Gump code and data" Reply-To: "Gump code and data" Delivered-To: mailing list general@gump.apache.org Received: (qmail 72206 invoked by uid 99); 17 Nov 2004 10:15:45 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [62.96.16.111] (HELO bodewig.bost.de) (62.96.16.111) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 02:15:43 -0800 Received: (from bodewig@localhost) by bodewig.bost.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) id iAHAFaK07759; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 11:15:36 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: bodewig.bost.de: bodewig set sender to bodewig@apache.org using -f To: general@gump.apache.org Subject: Re: Kaffe build X-Draft-From: ("nnfolder:mail.gump-general" 5375) References: From: Stefan Bodewig Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 11:15:36 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Bodewig's message of "Mon, 15 Nov 2004 16:04:05 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Security Through Obscurity, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > For some reason Kaffe's java.util.zip.ZipEntry throws an exception > in setCompressedSize when invoked for META-INF/ (which is a > directory and should thus have compressedSize == size == 0, > compression is STORED). It's a stack overflow, strange. Is Kaffe's default stack size smaller than the size of your usual JVM? Should we increase it by default? Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@gump.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@gump.apache.org