gump-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefano Mazzocchi <>
Subject Re: [RT] Selling Gump...
Date Tue, 19 Oct 2004 12:37:48 GMT
Eric Pugh wrote:

> To sum up..  Better marketing of Gump and easier use of a specific version
> of a Jar would really help Gump's acceptance and percieved value.

Yes, definately agree.

Here is my todo list:

  1) push for equilibrium [ongoing]
  2) push for metadata aggregation back in gump [ongoing, two modules 
left, soon both will be resolved]
  3) separate the build part from the data presentation part [starting]
  4) implement continous building
  5) implement jar fallback

Note how #5 will allow us to move to the what you describe: the 
convergence of continous integration and build systems.

I agree with Niclas, Gump needs better marketing.

The way I see it, Gump is a "cause->effect" amplifier. It should amplify 
the "cause" of some effect on a project, either your own, or projects 
you depend on.

For this to work properly, we need an tree in equilibrium and this is 
what we should focus on first.


View raw message