Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-gump-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 46331 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2004 07:19:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Sep 2004 07:19:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 35923 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2004 07:19:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-gump-general-archive@gump.apache.org Received: (qmail 35894 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2004 07:19:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@gump.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Gump code and data" Reply-To: "Gump code and data" Delivered-To: mailing list general@gump.apache.org Received: (qmail 35880 invoked by uid 99); 7 Sep 2004 07:19:22 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [62.96.16.111] (HELO bodewig.bost.de) (62.96.16.111) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Sep 2004 00:19:22 -0700 Received: (from bodewig@localhost) by bodewig.bost.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) id i877JJN12471; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 09:19:19 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: bodewig.bost.de: bodewig set sender to stefan.bodewig@freenet.de using -f To: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net, general@gump.apache.org Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Re: NAnt X-Draft-From: ("nnfolder:mail.nant" 7470) References: <001b01c49422$a95586d0$6d30170a@corponet.era.pl> <016e01c4943d$025e8000$6501a8c0@sybase.com> From: Stefan Bodewig Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 09:19:19 +0200 In-Reply-To: <016e01c4943d$025e8000$6501a8c0@sybase.com> (Adam R. B. Jack's message of "Mon, 6 Sep 2004 12:11:59 -0600") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Security Through Obscurity, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Mon, 6 Sep 2004, Adam R. B. Jack wrote: > 1) A project can have an attribute of language="csharp" (and this is > needed to generate lib path). wouldn't we need a more generic "platform" or something like this. Would the lib path treatment of a J# or Nemerle or whatever .NET supported language be any different from the csharp case? > 2) The workspace can have to set > the framework (passed to NAnt, must be a recently nightly, using > -t:). Good idea. > 3) able to be replaced by with some type information would be my preference since it would also allow us to unify and . Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@gump.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@gump.apache.org