gump-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefan Bodewig <>
Subject Re: Traditional 'Branch'
Date Mon, 19 Jul 2004 08:29:34 GMT
> Nicola wrote;
>> Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>> ...
>> > Ok, what about moving all the code to subversion and just keep
>> > the metadata in CVS? (at least for now)
>> IIRC that what we had basically agreed was a sensible thing to do
>> for Python Gump.
>> +1 from me

+1 from me as well.

On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Adam R. B. Jack <> wrote:

> Yeah, I think we agree that is the best mid-term solution, I was
> just (1) nervous about making an SVN request ('cos of delays in
> getting the resources configured/converted)

No problem.

> (2) hoping to clean out/re-organize now (prior to any such 1 above).

As long as we keep the history of "traditional" in CVS I don't care
too much whether it gets migrated to SVN at all.  It's not as if we'd
remove the CVS module completely, it will just become unused.

> Big questions (1) folks ok w/ me doing a clean/re-org prior to
> importing into SVN?

See above.

> (2) do we want to preserver history?



To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message