Mailing-List: contact general-help@gump.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Gump code and data" <general@gump.apache.org>
Message-ID: <168901c4497c$d048c9a0$ab71eb43@sybase.com>
From: "Adam R. B. Jack" <ajack@trysybase.com>
To: <general@gump.apache.org>
References: <15aa01c44975$1d998c60$ab71eb43@sybase.com>
 <m3pt8g4rnl.fsf@bodewig.bost.de>
Subject: Re: Resolving Gump/Maven Artefact Identifiers (MX4J)
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 09:09:42 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


> On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Adam R. B. Jack <ajack@trysybase.com> wrote:
>
> > 1) I've removed the id="" here (and will cleanup what fallout I can)
> > 'cos Gump defaults id equal to jar basename,
>
> This is not entirely correct - and we either kill all "traditional
> Gumps" now or get into a maintainence nightmare if you want to rely on
> this.

Oops. Yeah, I've heard of that Gump. Darn, that is what I get for cutting
down on caffeine.

> "Traditional" and "Python" Gump behave differently in absence of an id
> attribute - for the short term you may want to stick with explicit
> ids.

Agreed.

regards,

Adam


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@gump.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@gump.apache.org