Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-gump-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 76025 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2004 14:26:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jun 2004 14:26:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 56130 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2004 14:26:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-gump-general-archive@gump.apache.org Received: (qmail 56101 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2004 14:26:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@gump.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Gump code and data" Reply-To: "Gump code and data" Delivered-To: mailing list general@gump.apache.org Received: (qmail 56085 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2004 14:26:39 -0000 Received: from [130.214.10.19] (HELO mx1.try.sybase.com) (130.214.10.19) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Jun 2004 07:26:39 -0700 Received: from mail.try.sybase.com (mail.try.sybase.com [130.214.10.18]) by mx1.try.sybase.com (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id i53DQm231910 for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 07:26:48 -0600 Received: from tsws1 ([10.22.120.99]) by mail.try.sybase.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id i53E4gk02065 for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 08:04:43 -0600 Message-ID: <15c301c44976$c0ec0b80$ab71eb43@sybase.com> From: "Adam R. B. Jack" To: "Gump code and data" Subject: Mailing lists Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 08:26:19 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I was wondering if we have enough traffic on this list to warrant a split to multiple lists. I've heard folks complain about traffic, and there are times it really flurries. I worry that 'user' requests don't get the wide audience they deserve due to overload w/ RTs & development ideas. I can think of three use cases (1) developing Gump [RTs and more] (2) working with the Gump service [hey, I got nagged, what is this?] (3) Personal Gumps. I know there are pros and cons to having multiple lists, but I think we've reached a point where one list if overload. Perhaps the latter two are best served by one, for now. I don't know if it is worth renaming general@ to be dev@, I suspect not. As such, I think we ought add users@gump.apache.org. Thoughts? BTW: Do we know how many addresses are subscribed to general, how many are moderated in, and so forth? Just curious. regards, Adam -- Experience the Unwired Enterprise: http://www.sybase.com/unwiredenterprise Try Sybase: http://www.try.sybase.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@gump.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@gump.apache.org