gump-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Adam R. B. Jack" <aj...@trysybase.com>
Subject Re: Resolving Gump/Maven Artefact Identifiers (MX4J)
Date Thu, 03 Jun 2004 15:09:42 GMT

> On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Adam R. B. Jack <ajack@trysybase.com> wrote:
>
> > 1) I've removed the id="" here (and will cleanup what fallout I can)
> > 'cos Gump defaults id equal to jar basename,
>
> This is not entirely correct - and we either kill all "traditional
> Gumps" now or get into a maintainence nightmare if you want to rely on
> this.

Oops. Yeah, I've heard of that Gump. Darn, that is what I get for cutting
down on caffeine.

> "Traditional" and "Python" Gump behave differently in absence of an id
> attribute - for the short term you may want to stick with explicit
> ids.

Agreed.

regards,

Adam


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@gump.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@gump.apache.org


Mime
View raw message