gump-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stephen McConnell <mcconn...@apache.org>
Subject Re: The Opposite of Incubator
Date Tue, 04 May 2004 21:43:10 GMT
Niclas Hedhman wrote:

> On Wednesday 05 May 2004 00:37, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> 
>>On Tue, 4 May 2004, Adam R. B. Jack <ajack@trysybase.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Assuming that Phoenix goes into archive, what do we do for James
>>>(and others)? There are a few:
>>
>>Turn phoenix into an installed package.
>>
>>
>>>Things below Phoenix are still developing, and can (have?) break
>>>Phoenix. As such, we can't even package Phoenix & expect success for
>>>James and such.
>>
>>Why not?  Phoenix will never change.
> 
> 
> Part of the problem (may) be;
> 
>   Phoenix depends on X.
>   James also depends on X.
> 
> X changes so it breaks Phoenix, but Phoenix comes with its own older version 
> of X, so "it doesn't change".
> What happens for James, since it will need to compile against either the X in 
> Phoenix or X provided by Gump.

Phoenix loads applications in their own classloader - i.e. the version 
used by Phoenix should not impact the version of something used in 
James.  I.e. James can build against X provided by Gump.

Stephen.


> Niclas


-- 

|---------------------------------------|
| Magic by Merlin                       |
| Production by Avalon                  |
|                                       |
| http://avalon.apache.org              |
|---------------------------------------|


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@gump.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@gump.apache.org


Mime
View raw message