gump-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Niclas Hedhman <>
Subject Re: Maven/Gump & Artefact/Jar Identifiers
Date Tue, 11 May 2004 15:47:47 GMT
On Tuesday 11 May 2004 21:20, Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 May 2004, Adam R. B. Jack <> wrote:
> > > I think we bite the bullet and change our id's to be artefact ids
> > > (changing metadata as we need). Any thoughts?
> >
> > Is there a 1:1 mapping of Maven artefacts to <jar>s?
> I *beleive* so.

Not entirely true...

1. There may not be any Jar at all, if the project generates something else.
2. There may be more than one Jar, if the maven.xml in the project is made to 
construct any number of Jars.

There is a big distinction between Maven default behaviour and what can 
actually be done.

I suggest that Gump would follow the Ant model, except that there is not 
necessarily any 'build file', but a 'build dir', in which a Maven goal is 

Regarding the 'dependencies', I suggest that Gump places all the 'builds' into 
the local repository  "~/.maven/repository", and then just run Maven in 
off-line mode. It shouldn't be necessary to depend on the plugins being Gump 
aware, IMHO, as Brett was indicating.

|         |
|   |

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message