Mailing-List: contact general-help@gump.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Gump code and data" <general@gump.apache.org>
To: general@gump.apache.org
Subject: Re: Deprecating Traditional Gump
References: <405A8F63.8030009@apache.org>
From: Stefan Bodewig <bodewig@apache.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 08:04:16 +0100
In-Reply-To: <405A8F63.8030009@apache.org> (Stefano Mazzocchi's message of
 "Fri, 19 Mar 2004 01:12:51 -0500")
Message-ID: <m3d679pbbj.fsf@bodewig.bost.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Security Through
 Obscurity, linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Stefano Mazzocchi <stefano@apache.org> wrote:

>   1) state loud and clear that the direction is Gumpy and retire
> traditional gump, this will help creating itches to scratch

+1

>   2) refactor our CVS module:
> 
>       gump-traditional
>       gump
>       gump-data

Hmm, looks like going a little too far.  But if we go that route, we
may want to move the code modules to svn.  No strong opinion.

>   3) stop calling it gumpy but rather start doing version numbering,
> so that would be Gump 2.0, when Gump 1.0 was traditional

+0.5

I'm not sure that names matter, as long as everybody involved know
what is what ...

>   4) add a cron job so that Gump@moof becomes the official gump run.

If it works as stable as LSD, +1.

Stefan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@gump.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@gump.apache.org