Mailing-List: contact general-help@gump.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Gump code and data" <general@gump.apache.org>
Message-ID: <0b7b01c4030a$ce51cc40$d88b1f43@tsws1>
From: "Adam R. B. Jack" <ajack@trysybase.com>
To: "Gump code and data" <general@gump.apache.org>
References: <c12pjf$bv2$1@sea.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: gumpy memory size
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 16:37:13 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I'm watching a Gumpy run, and it's memory usage is minute in comparison:

18013 ajack     16   0 24116 5324  1028 S     1.3  0.5   3:20   0 python

> last night's run is still running (that's about 14 hours). Memory
> usage...454mb:
>   1642 ajack     30  15  454M 201M  154M R N   1.5 80.7  34:08   0 python
> do we have a memory leak somewhere?

Could it be that Gumpy was niced so low that Python's garbage collection
loop (I assume it has one) wasn't kicking in? Long shot, but I wonder.

For anybody whose looked at the logs a little while back, you'd've seen I
tried to detect resources (via Python call) but it doesn't appear to be
fully implemented & reports '0' for memory usage.

Anyways, memory usage doesn't seem to be a problem right now.

BTW: I did put a lock into gumpy.py, not that this is finished/fully
deployed yet.

regards,

Adam


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@gump.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@gump.apache.org