gump-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sam Ruby <>
Subject Re: Gump Thrashing/Spinning...
Date Sun, 28 Mar 2004 03:13:45 GMT
Nick Chalko wrote:

> Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>> \
>>> .
>> Ok, I think that reducing complexity is critical for wider adoption.
>> +1 in removal of forrest and go plain XHTML + CSS. But please, let's 
>> use a velocity-like approach, not a DOM like approach!
> I am not sure how removing forrest reduces complexity. It just means we 
> have to maintaining the template / site code ourself.

I'll certainly guilty of being away for a while, but 
gump.document.forrest is not a small thing, and to my eyes, not entirely 

A design point for the original gump is that output was viewable as it 
was produced.  Is this the case for gumppy w/ forrest?

- Sam Ruby

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message