gump-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sam Ruby <ru...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Gump Thrashing/Spinning...
Date Sun, 28 Mar 2004 03:13:45 GMT
Nick Chalko wrote:

> Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> 
>> \
>>
>>> .
>>
>> Ok, I think that reducing complexity is critical for wider adoption.
>>
>> +1 in removal of forrest and go plain XHTML + CSS. But please, let's 
>> use a velocity-like approach, not a DOM like approach!
> 
> I am not sure how removing forrest reduces complexity. It just means we 
> have to maintaining the template / site code ourself.

I'll certainly guilty of being away for a while, but 
gump.document.forrest is not a small thing, and to my eyes, not entirely 
obvious.

A design point for the original gump is that output was viewable as it 
was produced.  Is this the case for gumppy w/ forrest?

- Sam Ruby

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@gump.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@gump.apache.org


Mime
View raw message