gump-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Davanum Srinivas <d...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: Deprecating Traditional Gump
Date Fri, 19 Mar 2004 10:59:05 GMT
+1 to all.

--- Leo Simons <lsimons@jicarilla.org> wrote:
> Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> >  1) state loud and clear that the direction is Gumpy and retire 
> > traditional gump, this will help creating itches to scratch
> 
> +1
> 
> >  2) refactor our CVS module:
> > 
> >      gump-traditional
> >      gump
> >      gump-data
> 
> hmm. Split between code and data seems sensible, but I don't really get 
> why we want gump-1.0 and gump-2.0 in seperate repos?
> 
> >  3) stop calling it gumpy but rather start doing version numbering, so 
> > that would be Gump 2.0, when Gump 1.0 was traditional
> 
> +1
> 
> >  4) add a cron job so that Gump@moof becomes the official gump run.
> 
> +1
> 
> -- 
> cheers,
> 
> - Leo Simons
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Weblog              -- http://leosimons.com/
> IoC Component Glue  -- http://jicarilla.org/
> Articles & Opinions -- http://articles.leosimons.com/
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> "We started off trying to set up a small anarchist community, but
>   people wouldn't obey the rules."
>                                                          -- Alan Bennett
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@gump.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@gump.apache.org
> 


=====
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@gump.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@gump.apache.org


Mime
View raw message