Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact gump-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list gump@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 15746 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2004 13:01:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO bodewig.bost.de) (62.96.16.111) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Feb 2004 13:01:43 -0000 Received: (from bodewig@localhost) by bodewig.bost.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) id i1QD1hO21615; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 14:01:43 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: bodewig.bost.de: bodewig set sender to bodewig@apache.org using -f To: gump@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Re: jcifs X-Draft-From: ("nnfolder:mail.gump-dev" 4436) References: <114501c3f95c$6bb2e720$e7931f43@tsws1> From: Stefan Bodewig Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 14:01:43 +0100 In-Reply-To: <114501c3f95c$6bb2e720$e7931f43@tsws1> (Adam R. B. Jack's message of "Sun, 22 Feb 2004 08:56:16 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Security Through Obscurity, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Sun, 22 Feb 2004, Adam R. B. Jack wrote: > http://lsd.student.utwente.nl/gump/jcifs/jcifs.html says 0.7.12, but > I can't seem to find on available here: > > http://users.erols.com/mballen/jcifs/ > > Ought we move up? Yes, I think so. We should periodically check all installed packages for newer versions. > Ought we make [for the time being] LSD a master, and cascade (via > rsync) to Covalent/DOTNOT, etc? Which would require us to install some kind of automatism on the other boxes. On top of that we can't use a public rsync server since some of the jars mustn't be distributed - the Sun jars for example. Stefan