Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact gump-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list gump@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 53413 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2003 18:32:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.try.sybase.com) (130.214.10.19) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Dec 2003 18:32:18 -0000 Received: from mail.try.sybase.com (mail.try.sybase.com [130.214.10.18]) by mx1.try.sybase.com (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id hB3HR5206269 for ; Wed, 3 Dec 2003 10:27:05 -0700 Received: from tsws1 ([10.22.120.101]) by mail.try.sybase.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id hB3IIdk22853 for ; Wed, 3 Dec 2003 11:18:39 -0700 Message-ID: <164201c3b9cb$e6605b40$9c27fea9@tsws1> From: "Adam R. B. Jack" To: "Gump code and data" References: <20031203005621.83743.qmail@web12821.mail.yahoo.com> <121801c3b93e$023a1e20$9c27fea9@tsws1> <011e01c3b943$69286bf0$3e92b050@EVESHAM> Subject: Re: Gump dates and times (Was Re: junit reports output) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 11:33:02 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > The build logs on covalent and cocoon show the start times of each project in the summary list, whereas the lsd list does not. > If one is waiting for a build to run, it is useful to be able to scan the times of builds earlier in the sequence. Any chance of > that being added to LSD? Good point. Added to CVS. > It would be useful to be able to display the times in GMT (or even better, local time for the browser), to make it easier to follow > the sequence of Gump builds. I've added timezone. I know these big public Gumps could work in GMT, but I think localtime w/ timezone is best for private ones, so chose that. > Another suggestion would be to do the CVS fetch just before the build, to reduce the time-lag between them. > If there is an error in a build, updates can easily miss the next one or two CVS runs, reducing turn-round for fixes. So do CVS/build, CVS/build not CVS/CVS, build,build ? That what you are saying? I am open minded to the idea, but not sure how it helps what you suggest. A run takes a finite amount of time, updates occur once a day (or, at most) once each of those finite times. How does your suggestion help? I've tried added the time of the CVS update to the build log. regards Adam