gump-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Leo Simons <>
Subject Re: Replacing Packages?
Date Mon, 08 Dec 2003 18:59:21 GMT
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
> Hmm, I wonder if this has been proposed before, it seems kinda obvious...
> Other than the distastefulness of having jars in CVS or SVN, why not replace
> packaged projects with those in modules? We could have a gump-packages
> module (or modules) that houses the jars, so we'd no longer need machine
> access in order to update jars. I see a few projects create 'mini-projects'
> for their packages stuff, so why don't we do this centrally for the main
> ones?
> Thoughts?

no-can-do. We have a licensing issue there (can't redistribute the sun 
jars, for example). We might be able to do this if we keep the cvs repo 
private though. Not sure.


View raw message