gump-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Adam R. B. Jack" <aj...@trysybase.com>
Subject Replacing Packages?
Date Mon, 08 Dec 2003 15:20:24 GMT
Hmm, I wonder if this has been proposed before, it seems kinda obvious...

Other than the distastefulness of having jars in CVS or SVN, why not replace
packaged projects with those in modules? We could have a gump-packages
module (or modules) that houses the jars, so we'd no longer need machine
access in order to update jars. I see a few projects create 'mini-projects'
for their packages stuff, so why don't we do this centrally for the main
ones?

Thoughts?

regards

Adam
--
Experience the Unwired Enterprise:
http://www.sybase.com/unwiredenterprise
Try Sybase: http://www.try.sybase.com


Mime
View raw message