Return-Path: <bodewig@apache.org>
Mailing-List: contact gump-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list gump@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 72462 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2003 07:22:35 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO bodewig.bost.de) (62.96.16.111)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Sep 2003 07:22:35 -0000
Received: (from bodewig@localhost)
	by bodewig.bost.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h8U7Mk006622;
	Tue, 30 Sep 2003 09:22:46 +0200
X-Authentication-Warning: bodewig.bost.de: bodewig set sender to
 bodewig@apache.org using -f
To: gump@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: Re: Gumping centipede
References: <055501c383a2$6aedb610$693e3a41@tsws1>
	<m3brt8nik3.fsf@bodewig.bost.de>
	<03a301c38438$d8b5e460$693e3a41@tsws1>
	<m3y8wbk2yk.fsf@bodewig.bost.de>
	<043e01c38445$3438e6a0$693e3a41@tsws1>
	<m3n0cocbat.fsf@bodewig.bost.de>
	<0abf01c38694$13531680$693e3a41@tsws1>
	<m3y8w7a937.fsf@bodewig.bost.de>
	<0bff01c386a2$c1f1a950$693e3a41@tsws1>
From: Stefan Bodewig <bodewig@apache.org>
Date: 30 Sep 2003 09:22:46 +0200
In-Reply-To: <0bff01c386a2$c1f1a950$693e3a41@tsws1>
Message-ID: <m365jawxix.fsf@bodewig.bost.de>
Lines: 36
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Portable Code)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

I've updated the logs with last night's build (ant-contrib-tests has
been hanging and I had to terminate it manually in case you're curious
about the build times).

See also <http://cvs.apache.org/~bodewig/gump/krysalis-version-debug.log>
for a manual invocation with 

./build.sh krysalis-version dist-gump -debug -logfile /tmp/krysalis-version-debug.log

and an empty CLASSPATH (using JDK 1.4.2).

When you try to parse this, you should know that
/home/bodewig/dev/gump is a symlink to /javastuff/gump.

On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Adam R. B. Jack <ajack@trysybase.com> wrote:

> It isn't a property but a static variable we test (I forget why we
> stopped using a property).

Sounds like a potential classloader problem then.  If centipede's
classes get loaded twice via different class loaders, you'll get two
instances of the same class that don't share the same static
variables.

> This time it is me that does not follow, 'cos (1) POI is nothing to
> do with me (2) POI gave up on centipede long ago, and uses plain
> ant.

My only exposure to a build using centipede has been when I tried to
debug a problem with POI's builds in Gump some months ago when they
still used centipede.  And at that time I found the nested <ant>
invocations incredibly difficult to follow, in particular since a
bunch of <antcall>s could have been depends attributes on targets as
well.  Things may have changed since then.

Stefan