Mailing-List: contact gump-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
To: gump@jakarta.apache.org
From: Leo Simons <leosimons@apache.org>
Subject: Re: How much of GUMP is Java?
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 00:23:55 +0200
Lines: 36
Message-ID: <bblrdf$s72$1@main.gmane.org>
References: <bblm5v$1do$1@main.gmane.org>
 <03ba01c32ade$831825d0$950014ac@tsc.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
 rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312
In-Reply-To: <03ba01c32ade$831825d0$950014ac@tsc.com>
Sender: news <news@main.gmane.org>

Adam wrote:
> I think you need to see the "Gump in Python" (no Java, no Scripting) entry
> on the Wiki. [I don't ahve the link here, or I'd post it] That and/or see
> the arguments in the archives for this list.

http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?GumpPython

(also has links to the arguments)

Berin wrote:
> Would it make sense to use Java for most of the work?

I think the answer is "it /could/ make sense".

Is it possible? yes.

Has it been tried? yes.

Why did that not work out? don't know.

Where would I start?

The gump website pretty much contains a rather extensive specification 
of the gump documentation and general usage pattern. Less 
well-documented there (but good info in the archives, and some scripts 
in cvs) is the usage pattern where one types

`build avalon-framework`

to (re-)run part of the gump build. From there, an [RT] or two might or 
might not spark more interest :D

g'night!

- LSD