gump-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21113] New: - usage.html does not mention "ant check" (or gump check)
Date Thu, 26 Jun 2003 14:19:29 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21113>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21113

usage.html does not mention "ant check" (or gump check)

           Summary: usage.html does not mention "ant check" (or gump check)
           Product: Gump
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: Other
            Status: NEW
          Severity: Normal
          Priority: Other
         Component: Java/XSLT
        AssignedTo: gump@jakarta.apache.org
        ReportedBy: ajack@trysybase.com


http://jakarta.apache.org/gump/usage.html -- perhaps it ougt be step #3. This 
is a critical step, perhaps the biggest time wasteer if not done.

Also, perhaps this issues ought go on usage.html or other:

Can these go on usage.html or a known issues page?

Known problems you may face:

* Win2K and earlier have limitations on environment variable lengths

* bash with cygwin on win32 may have worked at one time, it'scurrent status
  is unknown.

Things to avoid:

* don't try to intelligently subset this build and learn gump and verify
your installation all at once.  Build the full system.  Then learn by
trying things and asking questions.  Then try to intelligently subset the
build.

Mime
View raw message