gump-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeremias Maerki <dev.jerem...@greenmail.ch>
Subject Fw: Re: Cocoon FOP Block and Gump
Date Thu, 10 Apr 2003 12:39:11 GMT
Any idea? Does Gump have a problem when there's more than one email
address?

Forwarded by Jeremias Maerki <dev.jeremias@greenmail.ch>
----------------------- Original Message -----------------------
 From:    Stephan Michels <stephan@apache.org>
 To:      fop-dev@xml.apache.org
 Date:    Thu, 10 Apr 2003 11:58:35 +0200 (CEST)
 Subject: Re: Cocoon FOP Block and Gump
----



On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, Stephan Michels wrote:

> On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
>
> > Hello Cocooners
> >
> > Sam has agreed that we add a new Gump module for the maintenance branch
> > of FOP where our current releases come from. The FOP block currently
> > fails because it depends on the trunk code which represents our redesign
> > effort. For the moment Cocoon should depend on the new
> > "xml-fop-maintenance" Gump project descriptor I've just committed while
> > we're looking for a way to sort of API problems between Cocoon and the
> > two FOP development tracks.
> >
> > Would one of you please make the necessary changes in your Gump file? I
> > think the new project element should look like this:
> >
> >     <depend project="xml-fop-maintenance"/>
> >
> >     <nag from="Gump" to="cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org, fop-dev@xml.apache.org"/>
> >
> > I changed the "depend" and "nag" elements.
> >
> > I hope this will improve the current situation. I'm subscribed to
> > cocoon-dev now and will monitor things happening around cocoon-block-fop.
>
> Done, thanks Stephan Michels.

The current Cocoon gump build is broken cause some other things, but
anyway there comes no email to the fop-dev list, or am I wrong?

Hints?

Stephan Michels.

--------------------- Original Message Ends --------------------


Jeremias Maerki


Mime
View raw message