Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact gump-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list gump@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 2660 invoked by uid 98); 5 Jan 2003 15:00:21 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) Received: (qmail 2629 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2003 15:00:20 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO apache.org) (63.251.56.142) by nagoya.betaversion.org with SMTP; 5 Jan 2003 15:00:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 21938 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2003 14:59:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 21924 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2003 14:59:01 -0000 Received: from mail-6.tiscali.it (HELO mail.tiscali.it) (195.130.225.152) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jan 2003 14:59:01 -0000 Received: from apache.org (62.10.43.162) by mail.tiscali.it (6.5.032) id 3E1575F20009FA6F for gump@jakarta.apache.org; Sun, 5 Jan 2003 15:59:01 +0100 Message-ID: <3E184831.7090603@apache.org> Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2003 15:58:57 +0100 From: Nicola Ken Barozzi Reply-To: nicolaken@apache.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gump code and data Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-gump/project jakarta-ant.xml jakarta-commons.xml jakarta-taglibs.xml uddi4j.xml xml-crimson.xml xml-xerces.xml References: <20030105133307.65004.qmail@icarus.apache.org> <3E183658.9080703@cortexebusiness.com.au> <3E18368C.50704@gmx.de> <3E1836BE.20307@gmx.de> <3E1845CC.3050600@intertwingly.net> In-Reply-To: <3E1845CC.3050600@intertwingly.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Sam Ruby wrote: > Christopher Lenz wrote: > >> >>> BTW, no that the descriptors in the Gump module are accessible to all >> >> >> s/no/now >> >>> Jakarta (Apache?) committers, would it be recommended to move >>> descriptors that have been put in the project's CVS (Cactus or >>> Tomcat, for example) back into jakarta-gump ? > > > That would be my recommendation. Why not start with cactus? Centipede projects use the descriptor to run normal builds, so they will not move. I think that having descriptors away from where they belong kinda sucks, just like having documentation out of the project CVS repository. If a project doesn't compile with Gump, IMHO it's correct to simply overrule the remote version and work on a Gump version in the Gump repo. No need to move, just use another one. But if the project is capable of managing it, I repeat /if/, it's better that he keeps it. -- Nicola Ken Barozzi nicolaken@apache.org - verba volant, scripta manent - (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) ---------------------------------------------------------------------