gump-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nicola Ken Barozzi <>
Subject Re: cvs commit: jakarta-gump/project jakarta-ant.xml jakarta-commons.xml jakarta-taglibs.xml uddi4j.xml xml-crimson.xml xml-xerces.xml
Date Mon, 06 Jan 2003 15:10:01 GMT

Sam Ruby wrote:
> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>> I was thinking about the conceptual idea of having 
>> descriptors for Centipede projects in Gump CVS, and how this would 
>> make things difficult for Centipede projects.
> Suggestion: let's just note that it is very easy to move descriptors.
> For ASF projects which are not (yet) centipede based, the path of least 
> resistance seems to be to put them in the gump cvs repository.
> Given the current implementation of Centipede, the path of least 
> resistance for projects which are currently and actively using centipede 
> is to put such project descriptors in the project cvs.
> Moving project descriptors in anticipation of future use seems 
> counter-productive at this time.
> Future versions of gump or centipede (or centigump or gumpipede or 
> whatever) may change these observations.


> Peace?


I agree on all the line. Well said. Thank you.

Nicola Ken Barozzi         
             - verba volant, scripta manent -
    (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)

View raw message