Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 620CD200C48 for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 19:45:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 60802160B91; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 17:45:24 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 814C3160B81 for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 19:45:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 53292 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2017 17:45:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@guacamole.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@guacamole.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@guacamole.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 53282 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2017 17:45:22 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Apr 2017 17:45:22 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 3913BC0B74 for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 17:45:22 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.947 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.947 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=0.726, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, URI_HEX=1.313] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=g-lux.com.au Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hWwvezk8TIPo for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 17:45:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.g-lux.com.au (mail.g-lux.com.au [203.213.7.242]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 2E31A5F39D for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 17:45:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.8.103] (g1-27-253-251-7.bmobile.ne.jp [27.253.251.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.g-lux.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D297F25ED19 for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 03:45:06 +1000 (AEST) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.2.0 mail.g-lux.com.au D297F25ED19 Authentication-Results: mail.g-lux.com.au; dmarc=none header.from=g-lux.com.au DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=g-lux.com.au; s=mail; t=1491500707; bh=Yyeq+TFTZqpFPxufFQYSqsn8VM4DfGTVxfd9Jd4Zw6E=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=gKE/n+BzZh+pdTuLwrCNexWZvSgDk8frGzvLUciMuj0Z1HbGYmGgptIsWqgxNIwL8 fHidF331fHwnqL3LAJQK7aE/I4c24Ag9SJXfksh4tpFCGN6vDAAvW5/kf7Cmdmou8Q kYlO9H9cOPnncpR02EnXyNLvOxeJzoHnVGZbuwaU= Subject: Re: SQL Schema update for 0.9.12 needed? To: user@guacamole.incubator.apache.org References: From: Andrew Sedlak Message-ID: <2cf7827c-13f7-c1e7-32eb-dbd5bf2e194f@g-lux.com.au> Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2017 02:45:11 +0900 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------71CBB83347B315118BD1A4A4" archived-at: Thu, 06 Apr 2017 17:45:24 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------71CBB83347B315118BD1A4A4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Worked fine for me without a schema update. Guess it's not necessary for this release. ~Andrew On 07/04/2017 01:42, bth wrote: > > Im not seeing anything on a database schema update for release 0.9.12 > am I good to upgrade without one? > > Might want to make a note of this on the 0.9.12 release notes as it > appears in 0.9.11 and 0.9.10 > > Thanks again for the excellent software! > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *Brian Haskell* > Senior Systems Administrator > American Mathematical Society > 201 Charles Street > Providence, RI 02904 > Phone: +1 401.455.4059 > Fax: +1 401.331.3842 > > AMS on Social Media > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > View this message in context: SQL Schema update for 0.9.12 needed? > > Sent from the Apache Guacamole (incubating) - Users mailing list > archive > at > Nabble.com. --------------71CBB83347B315118BD1A4A4 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Worked fine for me without a schema update.

Guess it's not necessary for this release.

~Andrew


On 07/04/2017 01:42, bth wrote:

Im not seeing anything on a database schema update for release 0.9.12 am I good to upgrade without one?

Might want to make a note of this on the 0.9.12 release notes as it appears in 0.9.11 and 0.9.10

Thanks again for the excellent software!


Brian Haskell
Senior Systems Administrator
American Mathematical Society
201 Charles Street
Providence, RI 02904
Phone: +1 401.455.4059
Fax: +1 401.331.3842

AMS on Social Media

View this message in context: SQL Schema update for 0.9.12 needed?
Sent from the Apache Guacamole (incubating) - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

--------------71CBB83347B315118BD1A4A4--