Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AFDD200B48 for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 10:03:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 89746160A6D; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 08:03:19 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id AF5BF160A65 for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 10:03:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 2663 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jul 2016 08:03:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@guacamole.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@guacamole.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@guacamole.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 2653 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jul 2016 08:03:17 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 08:03:17 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 601911A0C3B for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 08:03:17 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.279 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.279 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nanocloud-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n3pIIHB6gWZW for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 08:03:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-f45.google.com (mail-wm0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id E483A5F4E7 for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 08:03:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f45.google.com with SMTP id f65so92428577wmi.0 for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 01:03:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nanocloud-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=68WIAtZFAHRCMwLAF45u8r5PcC1M52+sS0lLLkgrbrI=; b=xBy8Z0JCaBxJnCDuwlvzhbeJLX9gJ9zyQQehyMxHVYWxTWAlR8yyBUvs/qvO/+vWj8 vet0axPK4DDjskvybSMUOFL/JevMh8YLNzVQ/N/3aG5TQdyS2S9MuTsZO47TWwE4GTva 58Kh0qFhceykh/KqJkodTK4F61tC9/ZktWAE3ACdAUT7N4vWuJeRTyZpQonwhMYqGDyx boa0eb+oAvY91IFh5VDrz3dA9bzEzn+/BOwycy37UmQklt3bpgN+OUT0X45RNYfkGXMx WpvYluVgbNY5USQaY8nY3hE2qaHxeUXecH83xAiOcM8ktES9bVct+Nu5B27j37mrPAD8 t33g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=68WIAtZFAHRCMwLAF45u8r5PcC1M52+sS0lLLkgrbrI=; b=gOsCSCX5x0pB181GOKWOa9QPTQf0C0K0mOJDKQAdJpJ9waS1a9t6hu59DWya6usJwu Y1i+cLyQ6GSMHO7VEyHDks+gyxKs8K541UujfO/WyEWTnO15FnCM9viobAq2OJ7Y2zAl sPztludg4UMgm6VoWFehmZcF8GQ89/GYVVNNGTTaq+9UJkUEj56SFhiicS7bpU76Hcja GgheYUI3ftms2liSwL8jzh1pJuZXysiyN7cD8JGK5EoZ03wK4fpU9jR+U2Ez60ugETIn fa3DVrK2uSB3QdZotTNF0rMlTKnlKg1Q2IOAWJlxR7/vXE6GerR4rkNVm6b4rMp2rYfw Fgyw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKGUBp9eXZsnTCxDnkP8fZa8iLpseGnC+0uBOYQJgEIlLrr6H0dlCneSxsBnxeHeinjnMxpnxGf6sxWLw== X-Received: by 10.28.63.21 with SMTP id m21mr4268555wma.77.1468828992442; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 01:03:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Olivier Berthonneau Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 08:03:03 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Benchmark guacd performance with RDP To: "user@guacamole.incubator.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114b666e54ed020537e466c3 archived-at: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 08:03:19 -0000 --001a114b666e54ed020537e466c3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi there, I am using Guacamole to interact with Windows sessions over RDP. In my current configuration I have something like 10 simultaneous sessions open on the same guacd on a server with 2 cores and 4GB of memory. Everything works fine but if a user starts doing something crazy like moving windows really fast, the CPU gets used intensively. I am trying to measure this and produce a reproducible scenario to understand when I will have to scale and bring up more guacd. Has anyone work on such benchmark yet ? My guess is I will have to code a bot to connect to multiple sessions at the same time. As I want the session to produce change on the screen to generate load I was thinking of opening my session with a full screen video playing a typical usage of a Windows session. Has anyone any thoughts about this before I jump in ? - Bertho -- Olivier Berthonneau Software developer +33 6 66 80 64 14 www.nanocloud.com --001a114b666e54ed020537e466c3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi there,
I am using Guacamole to interact with Windows sessions over RDP.=
In my current configuration I = have something like 10 simultaneous sessions open on the same guacd on a se= rver with 2 cores and 4GB of memory.
Everything works fine but if a user starts doing something crazy like= moving windows really fast, the CPU gets used intensively.

I am trying to measure this and produce a reproducible scenario to under= stand when I will have to scale and bring up more guacd.

= Has anyone work on such benchmark yet ?

My guess is I wil= l have to code a bot to connect to multiple sessions at the same time. As I= want the session to produce change on the screen to generate load I was th= inking of opening my session with a full screen video playing a typical usa= ge of a Windows session.

Has anyone any thoughts about th= is before I jump in ?

- Bertho
--
Olivier Berthonneau
Software developer
+33 6 66 80 64 14
--001a114b666e54ed020537e466c3--