Am 08.01.2019 um 11:54 schrieb Paul
> (4) While
sponsorship is below what we'd like and below what it has
> at some previous points in Groovy life, it isn't 0.
We have several
> existing sponsors, e.g. OCI. The wording about the
collective should take
> that into consideration.
Yep. OCI is a great company for Groovy! We always
Let's imagine that would be really great if more
people involve into
developing Groovy, more big features(e.g. MOP2,
async/await) are completed
and hard issues(e.g. generics of STC) are fixed every year
Totally agree with you, just suggesting the wording
used is sensitive to existing players. I can help craft
wording if needed.
Might be worth thinking about whether existing sponsors would
consider giving their donation through the same channel ? Could have
different tiers of sponsorship (gold, silver, etc), with respective
logo sizes, etc to differentiate. Would lead to a greater exposure
I guess it would also not be too hard to integrate a sponsor names
or logos into e.g. Groovy console (if Apache allows that)...