groovy-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au>
Subject Re: Groovy 3 lambda, method reference, default methods
Date Thu, 22 Mar 2018 14:45:25 GMT
Currently, you can switch off the Antlr parser in Groovy 3.0 by setting the
antlr4 switch to false. We might deem that an implementation detail rather
than a supported feature. In any case, we will likely drop that fairly
soon, e.g. Groovy 3.1 (unplanned version number but assuming that's the
next version).



On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:59 PM, Daniil Ovchinnikov <
daniil.ovchinnikov@jetbrains.com> wrote:

> It will be deduced it from library with a single switch to use Parrot in
> 2.6.
> There is no other reason not to use library version, since Groovy can’t
> cross compile classes to run with old Groovy versions.
>
> —
>
> Daniil Ovchinnikov
> Software Developer
> JetBrains
> jetbrains.com
> “Drive to develop”
>
>
>
> On 22 Mar 2018, at 15:42, mg <mgbiz@arscreat.com> wrote:
>
> Will Groovy 3.0 feature support be configurable (as for Java), or will it
> be deduced from Groovy libs used, ... ?
>
> -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
> Von: Daniil Ovchinnikov <daniil.ovchinnikov@jetbrains.com>
> Datum: 22.03.18 12:41 (GMT+01:00)
> An: users@groovy.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Groovy 3 lambda, method reference, default methods
>
> IntelliJ will support Groovy 3 but with own parser.
>
> - using the parser provided by Groovy library restricts support to that
> library version;
> - compiler parsers are usually non-recoverable, but in IntelliJ we want to
> provide ability to work with broken code as much as possible, so we have
> own parsers for (almost) each language.
>
> —
>
> Daniil Ovchinnikov
> Software Developer
> JetBrains
> jetbrains.com
> “Drive to develop”
>
>
>
> > On 21 Mar 2018, at 22:30, mg <mgbiz@arscreat.com> wrote:
> >
> > I guess the Groovy 3.0/3.0-- (aka 2.6) syntax elements support will be
> switchable in IntelliJ, anything else would make little sense to me.
> > But we have the expert on this mailing list, who should be able to tell
> us... :-)
> > mg
> >
> > -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
> > Von: "Daniel.Sun" <sunlan@apache.org>
> > Datum: 21.03.18 17:10 (GMT+01:00)
> > An: users@groovy.incubator.apache.org
> > Betreff: RE: Groovy 3 lambda, method reference, default methods
> >
> > You can write Java8 style code(e.g. lambda, method/constructor reference,
> > etc.) when Parrot parser is enabled :-)
> > See https://github.com/danielsun1106/groovy-parser
> >
> >
> > > Is there then a major difference in language between 2.6+Parrot and
> 3.0?
> >
> > 3.0 enables Parrot parser by default, so no differences.
> >
> >
> > > I wonder if the IntelliJ support ticket should be updated to say
> support
> > > new language features in Groovy 2.6 as well?
> >
> > I see the title contains "Groovy 3", so I am not sure if it will support
> 2.6
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Daniel.Sun
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Users-f329450.html
>
>
>

Mime
View raw message