groovy-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au>
Subject Re: Improving named-argument support
Date Thu, 18 Jan 2018 02:17:46 GMT
Yes, we have spoken about providing named arguments as a language feature
before. It doesn't rule out the need for other options though. I have put
some comments in the issue.

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 7:37 AM, Nathan Harvey <nathanwharvey@gmail.com>
wrote:

> MG's approach is the one I favor, although I am not sure I like using = in
> the calling syntax; the colon makes more sense to me. Small detail, though.
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Users-f329450.html
>

Mime
View raw message