Mailing-List: contact users-help@groovy.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@groovy.apache.org
Subject: Re: @CompileStatic null iteration
To: users@groovy.apache.org
References: <2c3cb859-44a5-1aa6-a60d-8db79d001254@gmx.org>
Cc: Jochen Theodorou <blackdrag@gmx.org>
From: MG <mgbiz@arscreat.com>
Message-ID: <359256cf-c55c-5935-2e32-48dd15ebd68a@arscreat.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 01:19:27 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2c3cb859-44a5-1aa6-a60d-8db79d001254@gmx.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
archived-at: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 00:19:39 -0000


On 15.12.2017 20:29, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
> On 15.12.2017 16:44, mg wrote:
>> "If we want to keep static Groovy near Java as much as possible..." - 
>> who wants that ? ;-)

Was just kidding, of course, as you know for Minecraft modding I very 
much want that.

>
>> Btw, do we already have an official "@CompileStatic gotchas" section 
>> somewhere ?
>
> I think not. Feel free to add one ;)
>

I feel this should foremost go into the @CompileStatic source code 
groovy doc - do you agree ?

(Btw, when I checked the Groovy webpage documentation section 
(http://groovy-lang.org/metaprogramming.html#xform-CompileStatic), the 
"See section on type checking for details" link 
http://groovy-lang.org/metaprogramming.html#section-typechecked) seems 
to be broken...)

Cheers,
mg