groovy-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Sun <realblue...@hotmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE]About the Union Type for method/constructor declaration
Date Sun, 23 Jul 2017 09:41:23 GMT
Hi Jochen,

    As you said, it is actually union overloads. Fully supporting union type
is a big task. So I did not propose union type defination etc. for the time
being ;)

Cheers,
Daniel.Sun




--
View this message in context: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-About-the-Union-Type-for-method-constructor-declaration-tp5742265p5742274.html
Sent from the Groovy Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Mime
View raw message