Mailing-List: contact users-help@groovy.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@groovy.apache.org
Subject: Re: problem with GroovyLab startup at some platforms?
To: users@groovy.apache.org
References: <3cbc587f-8496-4272-8e25-6b4967ce34bc@teiemt.gr>
 <5880C194.9020208@gmx.org> <f9ebdc39-13ef-2445-35b5-105199b466cc@teiemt.gr>
 <d8f4d2fa-b883-2e24-d73f-4caed6966b38@ameritech.net>
 <d214c5a2-3b36-e1d4-6fba-a001703df2e6@teiemt.gr>
From: Ed Clark <eaclark@ameritech.net>
Message-ID: <a1c02bc9-b6cb-c1bb-aa92-c6a9fe657a2e@ameritech.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 09:31:04 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <d214c5a2-3b36-e1d4-6fba-a001703df2e6@teiemt.gr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
archived-at: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 14:31:22 -0000

Yea!  That did it.

Tho' I'm a bit surprised that if this was based on a .class mismatch, then
the various JVMs would have been more consistent in either accepting it
or failing it.  But, JVM details are mostly magic to me, so I shouldn't be
surprised when one incantation works and another one doesn't. :-)

In any case it's running again.

Thank you for working through this.

Ed


On 01/20/2017 06:04 AM, sterg wrote:
> Hi Ed,
>
>
> this time I recompiled the Groovy part of GroovyLab source code with the recent Groovy compiler.
>
>
> The old compiled .class files, could be the problem,
>
> since perhaps some missing libraries from the current GroovyLab libs,
>
> some .class format incompatibility, etc.
>
>
> .. please try this version, if now runs ...
>
>
> Best Regards
>
> Strergios
>