On 9. 11. 2016, at 19:44, Jochen Theodorou <email@example.com
> Also it should be noted that we already have an alias for "with", which is "identity". I would not want to have yet another one.
> Frankly... I think we should change what it returns.
whilst I agree too many aliases is a bad thing, in my personal opinion, breaking backward compatibility is worse.
> It is unlikely somebody did depend on with returning null.
I might be wrong as so often, but I can well imagine somebody depends on the current behaviour, which, far as I understand, is not returning null, but returning the result of the last expression in the closure -- precisely what I would myself like to be available in future as "resultWith".
All the best,