Mailing-List: contact users-help@groovy.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@groovy.apache.org
Subject: Re: Integrating Groovy with a Java EE application and Maven
To: users@groovy.apache.org
References: <nyukw00e07r47jjv37mj9jvy.1466271255660@email.android.com>
 <57658F26.5040909@gmail.com> <57668B83.4020307@gmx.org>
 <5768E6EB.3040809@gmail.com> <5769A5F1.3060907@gmx.org>
 <5769B435.8090401@gmail.com>
 <CADQzvm=qLxYtSfdC=a2nk74ONH4DdCz6J1OH7HVozbTdYGUWTw@mail.gmail.com>
 <576D54C5.2090407@gmail.com> <576D9AB0.7040703@gmx.org>
 <576F80DF.5010408@gmail.com>
From: Jochen Theodorou <blackdrag@gmx.org>
Message-ID: <576F9EC1.6050605@gmx.org>
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:22:09 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <576F80DF.5010408@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
archived-at: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 09:22:32 -0000

On 26.06.2016 09:14, Mr Andersson wrote:
>
>
> On 06/24/2016 10:40 PM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
>> On 24.06.2016 17:41, Mr Andersson wrote:
>> [...]
>>> If you want to convince me of switching, i am still looking/waiting for
>>> someone to offer cyclic dependency support between modules, since
>>> without it, my code is getting more complex than need be.
>>
>> then you probably do not want modules, but just multiple source
>> folders... because what advantages are left of modules if they are
>> cyclic?
>
> Access rights. Even if a module/package is a cyclic, unless another
> module has specifically declared that you can access it, can you access
> it. It is like packages, but with access rules attached to them, which
> does not exist currently.

How exactly are you using that? I know only dependencies, no module 
level access rights, since I guess you do not talk about jdk9 jigsaw. 
And how do these translate to runtime?

bye Jochen