groovy-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From C├ędric Champeau <cedric.champ...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: peristant and immutable collections
Date Wed, 14 Oct 2015 12:02:27 GMT
+1 for pcollections. Lack of activity doesn't mean lack of maturity or lack
of future activity.

2015-10-14 14:00 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Laforge <glaforge@gmail.com>:

> Also, PCollections is pretty friendly to the good old Map, Set, List
> interfaces, which would be thus Groovy-friendly too, with all our GDK
> shortcuts for these classes.
>
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Jochen Theodorou <blackdrag@gmx.org>
> wrote:
>
>> On 14.10.2015 11:55, Guillaume Laforge wrote:
>>
>>> PCollections sound like a good candidate, as you're its maintainer ;-)
>>> (so it's easy to fix bugs, make updates, etc), it's lightweight /
>>> standalone (not bringing odd dependencies).
>>>
>>
>> I can even make more fine grained jars and such, yes. But I don't want to
>> impose a library to others for this. And while I am the maintainer, I did
>> not really do much yet. There is quite some work to do for this library to
>> be more up to date and to improve the benchmarks. I may spend that time
>> anyway, just with a longer time period then
>>
>>
>> bye blackdrag
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Guillaume Laforge
> Apache Groovy committer & PMC member
> Product Ninja & Advocate at Restlet <http://restlet.com>
>
> Blog: http://glaforge.appspot.com/
> Social: @glaforge <http://twitter.com/glaforge> / Google+
> <https://plus.google.com/u/0/114130972232398734985/posts>
>

Mime
View raw message