groovy-notifications mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Daniel Sun (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Resolved] (GROOVY-6167) Generics: within a single declaration, generic type definition order matters
Date Thu, 17 May 2018 16:58:00 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-6167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Daniel Sun resolved GROOVY-6167.
--------------------------------
       Resolution: Fixed
         Assignee: Daniel Sun
    Fix Version/s: 2.5.0-rc-3
                   3.0.0-alpha-3
                   2.6.0-alpha-4

Fixed by https://github.com/apache/groovy/commit/48807d5b1ba094e2f0dc212b6c92b4b370fe8394

> Generics: within a single declaration, generic type definition order matters
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GROOVY-6167
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-6167
>             Project: Groovy
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Compiler
>    Affects Versions: 2.1.0, 2.4.0-beta-3
>            Reporter: Davide Cavestro
>            Assignee: Daniel Sun
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.6.0-alpha-4, 3.0.0-alpha-3, 2.5.0-rc-3
>
>
> The following is valid Java code, but the groovyc fails complaining
> {color:red}_unable to resolve class X_
> {color}
> {code:java}
> public class Foo<T extends List<X>, X extends Number>{}
> {code}
> while changing the generic type definition order it works
> {code:java}
> public class Foo<X extends Number, T extends List<X>>{}
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Mime
View raw message