groovy-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From MG <mg...@arscreat.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Polish the generics type syntax for closure
Date Sat, 16 Feb 2019 16:40:00 GMT
Hi Daniel,

I totally understand that you want to move this along, however I have 
just added a comment, suggesting an alternative, more concise syntax, 
which I believe would be worth considering:

Closure<R1|X:R2|Y,Z:R3>


Cheers,
mg

On 16/02/2019 16:46, Daniel.Sun wrote:
> Dear development community,
>
>     I completed the GEP for polishing the generics type syntax for closure[1]
> just now and happy to start the VOTE thread. The GEP is targeted for Groovy
> 3.0.0.
>
> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least
> three +1 PMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Polish the generics type syntax for closure
> [ ]  0 I don't have a strong opinion about this, but I assume it's ok
> [ ] -1 Do not polish the generics type syntax for closure because...
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel.Sun
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8992
>
>
>
>
> -----
> Apache Groovy committer
> Blog: http://blog.sunlan.me
> Twitter: @daniel_sun
>
> --
> Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html
>


Mime
View raw message