groovy-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Cédric Champeau <cedric.champ...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: About the lazy consensus on Pull Requests
Date Sun, 27 Jan 2019 21:05:19 GMT
I agree that no "big change" should be merged without review. 72h may sound
a lot, but it's not.


Le dim. 27 janv. 2019 à 22:01, Daniel.Sun <sunlan@apache.org> a écrit :

> I agree with you on most of your opinions, but some of them are a bit ideal
> for an open source project such as Apache Groovy IMHO. I feel that it is
> really hard to please all...
>
> P.S. One of my big projects has already used groovy 3.0.0-alpha-4, so far
> so
> good.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel.Sun
>
>
>
>
> -----
> Apache Groovy committer
> Blog: http://blog.sunlan.me
> Twitter: @daniel_sun
>
> --
> Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html
>

Mime
View raw message